← ComparisonsLength and spine thickness drawn to true scale from published specs. Profile is the shape family's outline, not a scan of this model.
Head to head
Buck 112 Ranger vs Buck 55
Buck 112 Ranger runs a 3″ clip point blade in 420HC; Buck 55 runs 2.375″ of clip point in 420HC. The Buck 55 is the lighter of the two by 4.00 oz.
01234567 in
- Buck 112 Ranger · Clip Point3″ blade · 0.12″ spine · 5.9 oz · ~0.7″ tall (derived)
- Buck 55 · Clip Point2.375″ blade · 1.9 oz · ~0.56″ tall (derived)
Spine thickness, same scale
0.12″
| Spec | BuckBuck 112 Ranger | BuckBuck 55 |
|---|---|---|
| Blade length | 3″ | 2.375″ |
| Spine thickness | 0.12″ | — |
| Overall length | 7.25″ | — |
| Closed length | 4.25″ | 3.375″ |
| Weight | 5.9 oz | 1.9 oz |
| Blade shape | Clip Point | Clip Point |
| Steel | 420HC | 420HC |
| Grind | Hollow | Hollow |
| Lock | Back Lock | Back Lock |
| Handle material | Ebony + Brass | Ebony + Brass |
| Country of origin | USA | USA |
| Price band | Budget | Budget |
Tinted rows are where these two differ.