← ComparisonsLength and spine thickness drawn to true scale from published specs. Profile is the shape family's outline, not a scan of this model.
Head to head
Buck 112 Ranger vs Buck 113 Ranger Skinner
Buck 112 Ranger runs a 3″ clip point blade in 420HC; Buck 113 Ranger Skinner runs 3.125″ of drop point in 420HC. The Buck 113 Ranger Skinner is the lighter of the two by 0.70 oz.
01234567 in
- Buck 112 Ranger · Clip Point3″ blade · 0.12″ spine · 5.9 oz · ~0.7″ tall (derived)
- Buck 113 Ranger Skinner · Drop Point3.125″ blade · 0.12″ spine · 5.2 oz · ~0.84″ tall (derived)
Spine thickness, same scale
0.12″
0.12″
| Spec | BuckBuck 112 Ranger | BuckBuck 113 Ranger Skinner |
|---|---|---|
| Blade length | 3″ | 3.125″ |
| Spine thickness | 0.12″ | 0.12″ |
| Overall length | 7.25″ | 7.25″ |
| Closed length | 4.25″ | — |
| Weight | 5.9 oz | 5.2 oz |
| Blade shape | Clip Point | Drop Point |
| Steel | 420HC | 420HC |
| Grind | Hollow | Hollow |
| Lock | Back Lock | Fixed |
| Handle material | Ebony + Brass | Ebony + Brass |
| Country of origin | USA | USA |
| Price band | Budget | Budget |
Tinted rows are where these two differ.